a级黄色片免费,欧美日韩国产在线人,亚洲色图.com

內(nèi)容簡介

高分作文，你也能寫！

? 文章按照常考題目分類，覆蓋考試話題，題型充分體現(xiàn)真題特色。

? 范文嚴(yán)格按照考題要求和評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)編寫，角度新穎、語言地道、表達(dá)豐富。

? 外教原創(chuàng)范文讓你學(xué)到真正的英語。詞匯句型豐富，幫你越過語言難關(guān)。

? 每課的"思路點(diǎn)撥"點(diǎn)透思維過程，幫你形成快速有效的寫作思路。

? 書后附常用連接詞等寫作必備詞匯，為文章添彩。

本書100個題目是在歸納歷年真題的基礎(chǔ)上預(yù)測出來的，體現(xiàn)考試命題規(guī)律，具有較高的針對性和仿真度。范文嚴(yán)格按照評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)創(chuàng)作，既有應(yīng)急的模板，也有新穎的加度和高分亮點(diǎn)語言。"思路點(diǎn)撥"有助于形成快速有效的寫作思路。

本書收錄的文章按照常考題目分類，覆蓋考試話題，題型充分體現(xiàn)真題特色。這些范文嚴(yán)格按照考題要求和評分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)編寫，角度新穎、語言地道、表達(dá)豐富。外教原創(chuàng)范文讓你學(xué)到真正的英語。詞匯句型豐富，幫你越過語言難關(guān)。每課的"思路點(diǎn)撥"點(diǎn)透思維過程，幫你形成快速有效的寫作思路。書后附常用連接詞等寫作必備詞匯，為文章添彩。

編輯推薦

全新超值升級版《背好的范文—英語專業(yè)八級經(jīng)典范文200篇》

100篇外教原創(chuàng)精品范文 + 100平篇英文原版閱讀名篇

product.dangdang.com/product.aspx?product_id=23214812

題型逼真，體現(xiàn)命題思路；話題分類，題材覆蓋真題；范文原創(chuàng)，高分語句迭出；思路點(diǎn)撥，破解寫作奧秘。

打開思路，激活靈感，獲取高分！

題型逼真，體現(xiàn)命題思路

話題分類，題材覆蓋真題

范文原創(chuàng)，高分語句迭出

思路點(diǎn)撥，破解寫作奧秘

作者簡介

杜魯門(Matthew Trueman)，加拿大多倫多人，畢業(yè)于加拿大西安大略大學(xué)毅偉商學(xué)院企業(yè)管理專業(yè)，曾從事會會計(jì)行業(yè)，2005年創(chuàng)辦翻譯公司，客戶遍及歐美以及中國和日本。Matthew現(xiàn)居中國，在公司和企業(yè)擔(dān)任高級翻譯和英語文案策劃。

在線預(yù)覽

Non-academic Subjects in the Curriculum

課程中的非學(xué)術(shù)科目

題目

Directions: Universities and colleges should teach only "academic" subjects, while "non-academic" subjects (such as physical education, music and art) should be removed from the course calendar. Do you agree with the above proposition? Why or why not?

參考范文

Non-academic Subjects in the Curriculum

It is sometimes argued that institutions of higher learning should offer only "academic" courses to students and exclude all courses that are deemed "non-academic." This argument, however, is flawed and without merit. The diverse selection of subjects offered at universities and colleges across China reflects the diversity of Chinese society itself. Attempts to draw an artificial line between academic and non-academic courses would not only limit students` choices, but also stifle the rich diversity that is vital for society to thrive as a whole.

One important reason for maintaining "non-academic" subjects in the curriculum is that the distinction between academic and non-academic subjects is itself subjective. Certain subjects, including mathematics, science and English, are often regarded as "academic", while subjects such as physical education, music and art are disparagingly viewed as "non-academic". While this distinction may appear to be valid on the surface, it is actually fallacious. The word "academic" itself refers to anything that is related to school, especially one of higher learning. It follows, therefore, that any body of structured learning established as a post-secondary course can and should be described as "academic".

Subjects that are sometimes labeled as "non-academic" have their own intrinsic value in both academia and society in general. If subjects such as music, art and physical education were shunned by colleges and universities, society would face a gradual stagnation of talented musicians, actors and athletes. Countless artists have honed their skills during their college studies and subsequently risen to stardom. American actors Ben Affleck and Matt Damon, for instance, scripted the movie Good Will Hunting while studying film and theater, a traditionally "non-academic" subject, at Harvard University. The movie went on to win an Oscar for Best Original Screenplay.

The inclusion into the curriculum of so-called "non-academic" subjects does not mean that traditional "academic" subjects will not continue to play a central role in post-secondary education. Indeed, courses like mathematics, science and English will always remain at the cornerstone of college education. Finally, all varieties of subjects, including both those regarded as "academic" and others that are deemed "non-academic", have a rightful place in the halls of academia.

范文翻譯

時常有人爭論說高等教育機(jī)構(gòu)應(yīng)該只給學(xué)生提供具有學(xué)術(shù)價值的課程，排除一切沒有學(xué)術(shù)價值的課程。但是這種論斷是錯誤的，沒有任何可取之處。高等教育給學(xué)生提供的各種各樣的選擇反應(yīng)了社會生活的多樣性。試圖給學(xué)術(shù)和非學(xué)術(shù)劃條界限不僅限制了學(xué)生的選擇也抑制了社會的豐富性和多樣性，而多樣性對于社會的整體繁榮發(fā)展是至關(guān)重要的。/在課程中保留非學(xué)術(shù)課程的一個重要原因是學(xué)術(shù)和非學(xué)術(shù)課程的區(qū)分本身是一種主觀的判斷。某些課程，包括數(shù)學(xué)、自然科學(xué)、英語常常被認(rèn)為是學(xué)術(shù)的，而像體育、音樂、藝術(shù)被輕蔑地認(rèn)為是非學(xué)術(shù)的。這種區(qū)分表面上是正確的，實(shí)際上是謬誤。學(xué)術(shù)本身是指和學(xué)校有關(guān)的一切專業(yè)，尤其是高等教育院校。因此教學(xué)體系做為高等教育課程的任何科目都能夠而且應(yīng)該認(rèn)為是學(xué)術(shù)的。/一些專業(yè)往往被標(biāo)為非學(xué)術(shù)的課程無論在學(xué)術(shù)界還是對整個社會都有他們自己內(nèi)在的價值。如果像音樂、藝術(shù)、體育這樣的學(xué)科被大學(xué)取消的話，社會上有才華的音樂家、演員和運(yùn)動員就會越來越少。無數(shù)的藝術(shù)家們都是在大學(xué)學(xué)習(xí)期間磨練技能后來逐步地成為了明星。比如美國演員本?阿弗萊克和馬特?達(dá)蒙就是在哈佛大學(xué)學(xué)習(xí)一個傳統(tǒng)上被認(rèn)為是非學(xué)術(shù)的科目——電影和戲劇時寫了《心靈捕手》的電影劇本。這部電影獲得了奧斯卡原創(chuàng)電影劇本獎。/整體課程中包含所謂的非學(xué)術(shù)課程不意味著傳統(tǒng)的學(xué)術(shù)課程在高等教育中就起不到核心的作用。事實(shí)上，像數(shù)學(xué)、自然科學(xué)和英語永遠(yuǎn)都是大學(xué)教育的基礎(chǔ)。，多種多樣的課程，包括被認(rèn)為是學(xué)術(shù)的課程和非學(xué)術(shù)的課程在學(xué)術(shù)的殿堂中都會有一個公正的位置。

思路點(diǎn)撥

作者開篇通過分析與駁斥題目中的觀點(diǎn)提出自己的立場：反對取消"非學(xué)術(shù)"課程。下文兩個自然段闡述了兩點(diǎn)理由：1.學(xué)術(shù)與非學(xué)術(shù)的區(qū)分純粹是主觀的判斷，并不科學(xué)；2.所謂的"非學(xué)術(shù)"課程有其自身學(xué)術(shù)價值和社會價值。本文主要采用了列舉事實(shí)的論證方法。作者概括全文并提出展望。